The confession around to death while word: letter A

 Milton Lima

23-11-2021

The other universal face of death 

A) It is the death of the nature

I have confessed for five years that this theme makes me think about life. The fortitude with all its breadth will lead us to face science as it has come to think about death. I see it from poetry as another toolbox, where we bring our dreams and where all human beings go.  Therefore, I repeatedly invite our reflection on them. Who are they? Well, here our problem begins. Concepts and worldview, conscious and unconscious, structure and system, war and peace, love and hate, all well built Malthusian. Thus, they are the ones who have made us believe that life will become virtual. Yes, your time now is their time. Do you believe in your heart that your work will now be back with the rights of man? They are crazy to make you believe that life is now something else. If life is not the same, how will such knowledge help me understand if death is death itself? We think of this first with one word: universal.

Power and power. Since I learned a language system, I also learned to read the symbols. I was born close to 90 years old. Where, in time, I saw that everything they did for me was a machine. But such a machine would come to move my social relationship with death. How this machine-made me without becoming a man of quality is the role at this point of reflection. While now I have my face of death in the care of medicine where I will say that I fall into reality when I am saved for science. It would be very nice if it were not for man's controlling role in nature. 

They have an agenda. And it seems to me that science now strives to facilitate the social role of death to be forgotten. When we understand to look at death with its other meaning, then we return to the verb that said the Lord is my shepherd and nothing will blame me.  

Consanguineous

 

The Power was been near by a long time the denial of death

By Milton Lima – 01/08/2021

 

I have had since I was twenty two a rather strong thought into death, but like a social fact I confess that in epoch I'd have not any idea than what I was thinking years ago. Maybe today I can say that in this way alone I created roots well deep about the study of a lot of important topics which now is very present.  We can say that the death was completely forgotten and some arguments don’t convince me because they once bury evidence of power that commands sooner or later what will be true in science. Now on go walking and see you with your own eyes what Ernest Becker as such works all it, in your psychology, with the book ‘The Denial of Death’, and will can to choose his own conclusion.

At same time than that I go invited them to see a reflection about the death, also I must do more a provocation, for example, why do we are not really with mind open to study about means of the finitude? Yet I would ask, why does not talk with the children about death too? After on this I arrive to citation the follow, when Ernest Becker says: (in chapter one about the theme Human Nature and the Heroic)

“In times such as ours there is great pressure to come up with concepts that help men understand their dilemma; there is an urge toward vital ideas, toward a simplification of needless intellectual complexity. Sometimes this makes for big lies that resolve tensions and make it easy for action to move forward with just the rationalizations that people need. But it also makes for the slow disengagement of truths that help men get a grip on what is happening to them, that tell them where the problems really are”.   

Politeness and wisdom to live in peace: surface relief of the death

 

Politeness and wisdom to live in peace: surface relief of the death

By Milton Lima 29-07-2021

Today we live in a world fully connected by things invented one. But why do we be affirmative? From this shift we were connected with science and if we care about her before it is because in the last two centuries before it’s clear of WWII such shift propaganda would be great to mankind? Well first point here seems to be a key in which this world should be another thing to be invented. Now like it, politeness done to a world limited by its borders can be transformed into another thing? What do I call the spirit of peace on this wisdom? Just right would give account on this and law or contract? How will we organize it? To answer them I must remember once that it or better to all that it is a hypothesis of work and that only will make sense if we look at the whole. When we know that of course it new shape of world nonsense is nothing more than a new form of power control.see here  

So it is that now we’ve called the new normal nothing more than a totalitarian system. When I had its idea to write and too can to speak of peace I  thinking in a translate that did here of Giorgio Agamben with title: Cittadini di seconda classe, and after it I believe to be very need to had in mind that now more that never we need of the wisdom to survive.

Indeed a lot of the water still runs here. We live in a world in which truth has now become relative, where lies are evaluated as true by giants big-tech, when your power becomes easy to again create polarization, be it political or not. Well if we did a search with the name Eugène Sue, we would have arrived at death in a determinate epoch. Go on!

However, we will have more ways of light and the unforeseen. ST. Augustine's and Hannah Arendt together can aim us to understand this moment of shadow, but their same love needs to be tested as positive or negative, and mask too, acknowledging this. Here it seems to me that they are welcome, first because one paints a city with two ways with symbolism between goodness and madness, the second will go to trouble who indeed was given such a way of hope. It goes to love. The framework of death in action arrives in the conscience of a new age. For its direction we permit this development. They are here and there, in my country and amid us, maybe a contingent when just is possible see them like heroes.