By Milton Lima
06-06-2025
Are you able to finance our activities? Donate here
The word that best describes Daria Dugina is
'philosophical skill'. I am not judging the value of her theory, but rather
using her arguments to explore the future vision set out by the Nouvelle Droite
as envisaged by Dugina. She believes that
Dugina's book is
full of rhetoric that she considers to be both Platonic and philosophical. As a
French-trained philosopher and the daughter of the philosopher Alexander Dugin,
one might say that if she were she not Russian, she would be French.
Her interest in
French ideas and her view of
Further
information on the key themes addressed in the book can be found in the text
below (here).
She gets right to the heart of the matter on page 16: “...the French Nouvelle Droite represents a Traditionalist, cultural, conservative revolution. The New Right might be called the new encyclopaedists or the new European “Enlightenment”—Enlightenment 2.0—but in the reverse.” The original Enlightenment, one of the most persuasive con jobs in history, broke the traditions of Europe and Western European Civilization by insidious design. It represented the end of the traditional monarchies, the end of meaningful Western European Christianity, a recalculation of the Greco-Roman legal and philosophical legacy, and the alteration of the organization of European nation-states and polities. Going in reverse means ending the charade and lies of the past five hundred years and reestablishing the old order of Christendom.
What struck me
most about her approach to defending the right with her famous references was
the fact that she referenced Alain de Benoist's trajectory, and didn't shy away
from citing the work of both Julian Freund and Carl Schmitt.
Her desire to look
to ancient
As that the author
references the work of various other authors, some of the details in the book
warrant further theoretical study. I am only familiar with some of these
authors, and I am entirely unfamiliar with the rest. Nevertheless, based on my
limited knowledge of political and theoretical debates on the right, I can say
that the book is very good.
No comments:
Post a Comment