By Laurent
Mucchielli
Contact: laurent.mucchielli@protonmail.com
Text: La vaccination Covid à l’épreuve des faits. 2ème
partie : une mortalité inédite
Thank you very much, Laurent Mucchielli, I thank the professor for authorization your publication
here.
Translate by Milton Lima
Laurent Mucchielli is sociologist, director of research at the CNRS (Centre Méditerranéen de Sociologie, Science Politique et d’Histoire).
The pharmacovigilance of the vaccines covid is denied because
there is a threat to its ideology at complete vaccination accomplished from
pharmacists industry, governments and mainstream media. This vaccination in
mass, however, has shown an unprecedented mortality if considered to history or
to modern medicine. It is urgent to postpone it to evaluate the balance of
benefits/risk, case to case.
Addendum:
Par
Laurent MUCCHIELLI (sociologue, directeur de recherche au CNRS), Hélène BANOUN
(pharmacien biologiste, PhD, ancienne chargée de recherches à l’INSERM),
Emmanuelle DARLES (maîtresse de conférences en informatique à Aix-Marseille
Université), Éric MENAT (docteur en médecine, médecin généraliste), Vincent
PAVAN (maître de conférences en mathématique à Aix-Marseille Université) &
Amine UMLIL (pharmacien des hôpitaux, praticien hospitalier, unité de «
pharmacovigilance/CTIAP (centre territorial d’information indépendante et
d’avis pharmaceutiques)/Coordination des vigilances sanitaires » du Centre
hospitalier de Cholet).
Previously
in our mini-series on vaccination, we looked that there is diverse opinions of
specialist an available epidemiological, about those data on a global scale
thus sufficient to prove that vaccination does not protect against the
contamination and transmission of Sars-Cov-2, in particular the current Delta
(or Indian) variant, off which massively contradicts the repeated statements of
the representatives of the French executive power, with respect to
"vaccine protection". In the United States, the director of
NIAID, Antony Fauci, has just publicly acknowledged this, even recommending the
wearing of masks indoors by vaccinated people. Another
example, in England,
the tourists French must wait in quarantine and it’s a rule for anyone that has
been vaccinated. Therefore,
it is already clear that vaccination is not the miracle solution announced to contain
the epidemic and that the blackmail formulated by the French executive (general
vaccination or reconfinement) is based on a lie. A second lie repeated several times by
both the President of the Republic, the Prime Minister and the Minister of
Health (and other elected officials adopting authoritarian health postures,
like the Mayor of Nice Mr. Estrosi) is probably the alleged virtual disappearance ("96%") of
severe forms of Covid thanks to vaccination. In Israel,
one of the countries where the population is the most vaccinated in the world,
the authorities have just decided to close the country's borders to vaccinated tourists,
indicating not only that vaccination does not protect against contamination and
transmission, but also that the majority of people hospitalized for severeforms are now vaccinated people. All this clearly suggests that there is a gulf
separating the marketing of industries (taken up by political propaganda) from
the realities of public health. And it is also at the bottom of this chasm that
the question of the most serious adverse effects of Covid vaccination, the
subject of this new episode, is forgotten until the moment.
Coming out of denial, we observing coldly the
pharmacovigilance data
Here too
in another previous episode of our investigation, we identified how and why diverse
French journalists working in the mainstream media have betrayed some basic
ethical principles of their profession, no longer exercising their role as a
counter-power to become irrelevant in struggle or mere relays of government
communication. In peculiar, the end of investigative journalism, replaced by
office fact-checking that is no more than a mockery of journalism. With regard
to the safety of anti-covid vaccines, pseudo-journalism will thus seek to deny
the reality of adverse effects, in line with the government's discourse. One
example among many is provided by the fact-checkers of the television group TFI-LCI
who, since January 2021, have been striving to deny any negative medical
consequences of vaccination (the last article in this sense is to be read
here).
The
argument is always the same, and it is well known. On all pharmacovigilance
sites in the world, there are indeed the same interpretive precautions
indicating that the reports of adverse reactions attributed to a particular
drug are only a presumption of causation (imputability). However, this
presumption is considerably reinforced when deaths occur very quickly after vaccination,
which is the case as we will see with the American data (the vast majority of reported
deaths occurred within 48 hours).
Moreover,
these reservations of interpretation are to be applied to pharmacovigilance in
general, and we will see that the comparison with other medicines shows that something
new is indeed happening for these genetic vaccines against covid. As usual,
journalists are blinded by their dependence on political power and institutional
sources directly linked to the Ministry of Health, and they demonstrate a
critical mind with extremely variable geometry. The same precautions apply, for
example, to the counting of deaths attributable to Covid (deaths from Covid or
with Covid?), a subject on which we have hardly ever read a critical article in
the press. Another striking example of bias: at the end of March 2020, it had
enough 3 cases of death (related in reality to overdosed self-medications)
raised by pharmacovigilance to trigger in France a political-media storm onthe theme of the dangerousness of hydroxychloroquine.
In other words, for most
journalists, health statistics are indisputable when they go in the direction
of the official narrative, but they suddenly become questionable when they
contradict that same narrative. This intellectual dishonesty should be obvious.
In
addition, we will see that, in some countries (such as France but also the United States), the feedback of
pharmacovigilance information on the safety of anti-covid vaccines are mainly
the work of doctors and not of patients. And we will also see that they largely
corroborate those of countries (such as the Netherlands) where the declaration
is mainly made by the sick. We will even see that there is research that has
retrospectively tested the reliability of these statements, and that indicates
a high level of reliability.
At a
distance from these games of representations and these arguments of authority,
we will therefore here coldly observe the data of pharmacovigilance concerning
the safety of anti-covid vaccines. And we are going to do this in several
countries in order to escape the French tropism. We will then see that, in
reality, the same observations can be made almost everywhere in Western
countries.
The last
point before we begin to examine the figures is that, far from exaggerating the
problems, these figures should on the contrary be regarded as minimums that
underestimate reality. Indeed, pharmacovigilance works almost everywhere
passively (and not pro-active): the centers dedicated to the collection of adverse
drug reactions wait for health professionals and individuals to report problems
to them. If for one reason or another (forgetfulness, uncertainty,
self-censorship, lack of time or negligence of general practitioners or
hospitals, isolation of the patient who dies alone at home, ignorance of the
medical record of the deceased person by the doctor drawing up the death
certificate, various and varied computer problems, etc.) doctors or patients do
not fill out the incident declaration form, it will never be known. Therefore,
the underestimation of the real state of the problems is both permanent and
massive. The first French studies, in the early 2000s, estimated that about 95%
of adverse drug reactions were not reported. While it may be possible to assume
that under-reporting is primarily for less serious adverse reactions, all of
the following should therefore not only be taken very seriously, but also seen
as most likely a euphemization of the reality of the safety problems posed by
covid vaccines (as with any other medicine).
In France, the reports of the Medicines Agency
In France, the National Agency for the Safety of
Medicines (ANSM) publishes a "weekly monitoring of adverse reactions ofvaccines" of which we have reviewed the detailed reports on each of the
four vaccines used in France.
We will systematically observe what is said about "serious" effects
(as opposed to non-serious effects which are small immediate local reactions to
the injection).
Regarding
the AstraZeneca vaccine, the ANSM indicates that 7.2 million doses had been
administered as of July 8, 2021, mostly in the population targeted by the
vaccine recommendations of those over 55 years of age, but "there are
nevertheless 623 doses traced as administered to patients less than 16 years of
age". On the same date, more than 22,071 adverse events were reported,
exclusively by health professionals (we remember that it was reserved for them
as a priority at the beginning, in accordance with the Recommendation of theHigh Authority of Health of February 2, 2021),including 5,191
"serious" events (almost a quarter of the total). As shown in the
table below, these serious cases affect all age groups but are concentrated
between the ages of 30 and 74. Of these 5,191 serious events, a quarter
required hospitalizations, 247 were life-threatening, 121 resulted in
disability or incapacity and 170 resulted in death.
Regarding
the Pfizer vaccine, more than 42.5 million doses had been administered as of 1
July 2021 (including 700,000 to young people aged 16 to 18 years) and 31,389
adverse events/effects cases reported, mainly by health professionals. Of
these, 8,689 "serious" events occurring from the age of 30 (27.7% of
all adverse events), of which 2,551 were life-threatening, 460 disabilities or
disabilities and 761 deaths.
Regarding
Moderna's vaccine, the ANSM indicates that 5.2 million doses had been
administered as of 08 July 2021, including nearly 53,000 to minors. On the same
date, about 6,000 adverse events had been reported, of which 14.4% were serious
cases and as many "unexpected cases" (unfortunately, we do not know
what this category covers), reported here almost as much by individuals as by
health professionals. Of the 1,050 serious events, there were 312
hospitalizations, 50 life-threatening, 25 disabilities and 44 deaths (including
a few cases of fetal death). The main problems found among these serious cases
are hematological/vascular (thrombosis, stroke, pulmonary embolisms),
neurological (facial paralysis, generalized convulsions), cardiac (rhythm
disorders, myocarditis), to which are added "28 sudden unexplained deaths".
Source:
CRPV of Lille,
CRPV of Besançon, Pharmacovigilance survey of the VACCINE MODERNA see here
What are the side effects?
As of July
8, 2021, at the end of about 6 months of vaccination campaign, the French
pharmacovigilance of the AstraZeneca vaccine reports a total of nearly 43,000
adverse reactions/events, including 9,637 (22.5%) classified as
"serious". The latter are immediate reactions to vaccination,
diseases of the nervous system (paralysis in particular), vascular problems
(thrombosis, stroke in particular), serious respiratory and cardiac problems,
finally very important skin problems, hematological diseases and serious
disorders of vision and / or hearing.
See link
Vaxzevira in first frame.
The same
analysis can be done on the 4 vaccines that have serious adverse effects in
part different (especially neurological and nervous for Moderna and Janssen,
more cardiac for Pfizer).
Finally,
if we add up the most serious consequences, mentioned above for each of the 4
vaccines, we arrive at the table below which gives the observation of more than
15,000 serious adverse events, including nearly 1,800 hospitalizations, more
than 2,800 life-threatening and nearly 1,000 deaths potentially related to
covid vaccination. In just 6 months all.
What pharmacovigilance says in other Western countries
In the United Kingdom, the Ministry of Health
reports that, on 14 July 2021, approximately 20 million first and 12 million
second doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, 25 million first doses and 23
million second doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine (the pharmaceutical company is
based in London), and approximately 1.3 million first doses of the Moderna
vaccine were administered. In total, more than 46 million people received at
least one dose and more than 35 million received two doses. The pharmacovigilance report of 22 July begins by stating that vaccines are safe
and does everything to call for general vaccination. The beginning of the
official report indicates that vaccines have short-term adverse effects that
are very mild. For example, for Pfizer, "the most common side effects in
the trials were injection site pain, fatigue, headache, muscle pain, chills,
joint pain and fever; these have each been reported in more than 1 in 10 people. These
reactions were usually mild to moderate in intensity and resolved within a few
days of vaccination." Admittedly, the Ministry also states that it has
recorded some 325,000 reports of adverse reactions (two-thirds of which are for
AstraZeneca). But in detail, he specifies that "the overwhelming majority
of reports concern reactions at the injection site (arm pain for example) and
generalized symptoms such as "flu" syndrome, headache, chills,
fatigue (fatigue), nausea (urge to vomit), fever, dizziness, weakness, muscle
pain and rapid heartbeat. Generally, these occur shortly after vaccination and
are not associated with a more serious or lasting disease." In a word:
everything is fine. As in France,
the British government insists in its report that "vaccines are the best
way to protect people against COVID-19 and have already saved thousands of
lives. Everyone should continue to be vaccinated when asked to do so, unless
otherwise specified." And, have more yet. Once the introduction to the
glory of vaccination has passed, the second part of the report details the
adverse effects: anaphylactic shocks, Bell's palsy (facial paralysis),
thrombosis (71 deaths of this type with AstraZeneca), menstrual disorders and
vaginal bleeding, myocarditis and pericarditis (especially with Pfizer), severe
skin reactions (especially with Moderna), Guillain Barré syndromes (especially
with AstraZeneca) and finally "fatal events", i.e. deaths. In detail,
as of July 14, 2021, the British agency recognizes 999 deaths that the
declarations link to the injection of the AstraZeneca vaccine, 460 to that of
Pfizer and 31 others, which brings the total to nearly 1,500 deaths.
In the Netherlands,
the pharmacovigilance centre (bijwerkinden centrum - LAREB) provides a monthly
update on vaccination and its adverse effects, the latter being mainly reported
by citizens. In its last update on 4 July 2021, it reported 16.5 million doses
administered, mainly Pfizer (11.8 million doses, compared to 2.8 million for
AstraZeneca, 1.3 million for Moderna and 600,000 for Janssen). As of that date,
93,453 adverse reaction reports had been reported regarding the consequences of
covid vaccination, including thrombosis in the case of the AstraZeneca and
Janssen vaccines. Finally, the centre had 448 deaths reported as
vaccine-related, mainly in the elderly and mainly the Pfizer vaccine.
In Europe, the pharmacovigilance site of the
European Medicines Agency is particularly difficult to handle computerically,
the loading of data concerning Covid vaccines is complicated to find and
extremely time-consuming to carry out, when it works. However, two French
researchers studied them patiently at the end of June and presented in this video. At the end of June, the European pharmacovigilance had already recorded
about 9,000 deaths related to vaccination for the Pfizer vaccine alone, in
particular due to cardiac, pulmonary or cerebrovascular complications,
including deaths by Covid (a last straw for anti-covid vaccines...). In
addition, these data also give a second very worrying finding, which is the
fact that these risks of serious adverse reactions concern not only people over
65 years of age, but also infants and adolescents (12-17 years). In other
words, the genetic anti-covid vaccines used in Europe present risks of serious
adverse effects (up to death) in categories of the population that are in no
way threatened by Covid. The health professionals of the ReinfoCovid collective
and the Coordination Santé Libre have thus shown that, below the age of 45, the
balance between benefit and risk is very unfavorable to genetic vaccinationagainst covid. With regard to children and adolescents, it even amounts to a
form of violence against minors that it would therefore be criminal to
generalize. This is also an opportunity to recall that the WHO itself advisesagainst the vaccination of young people, whatever the French government and its
servants (among which the Academy
of Medicine is remembered
for the communication of May 25, 2021).
Finally,
in the United States, where
pharmacovigilance (like the transparency of public administration data in
general) is much better organized and more restrictive than in many European
countries, very precise data can be exploited on the site of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). And, contrary to the argument of the
industrialists, repeated in a loop by French journalists (like the
fact-checkers already mentioned), these data are very largely reliable. Six English researchers have just analyzed a sample of 250 death reports attributedto covid vaccines in VAERS. As a result, two thirds of the statements were made
by doctors and 86% of them are reliable. However, the findings of the American
data are even more striking. By searching these data for vaccination-related
deaths, it is possible not only to have a detailed count for each covid
vaccine, but also to be able to compare these results with those of all the
other vaccines administered for more than 30 years in this country. As of July
16, 2021, when 160 million Americans had been fully vaccinated, covid vaccines
are linked to more than 6,000 deaths,
91% of which are attributable to vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer alone (two US
pharmaceutical/biotech companies, Janssen being the Belgian subsidiary of
another US pharmaceutical company, Johnson &Johnson). We have reconstructed
the table below which gives the details of these figures.
Source:
VAERS, calculation made on data from July 16, 2021
These
deaths also occurred mainly within 48 hours of vaccination, which considerably
reinforces the presumption of causality. In addition, these files make it
possible to compare this mortality of anti-covid vaccines with the overall
vaccination mortality in this country for 30 years (concerning hundreds of
vaccines). This file gives a total of 16,605 deaths for all vaccines over the
entire period. Alone and in just 6 months, the anti-covid vaccination
represents 36% of the total vaccination mortality in this country for 30 years.
By comparison, in the same database, we counted the number of deaths caused by
the administration of the different seasonal influenza vaccines (seasonal
influenza). In 30 years (1990-2020), these vaccines have caused 1,106 deaths, which
represent 6.66% of total vaccine mortality over the past 30 years. Another way
to express these results is therefore to say that, in the United States,
in 6 months, covid vaccination has helped to kill 5 times more people than
influenza vaccination in 30 years. This confirms in yet another way that we are
indeed dealing with vaccines of a new kind, the dangerous nature of which is
unprecedented. Finally, let us add that this dangerousness must particularly
question when it concerns young people who are therefore not seriously
threatened by Covid. However, 23.2% of the total us deaths attributed to covid
vaccines and whose age is known were under 65 years old.
Conclusion
The issue
of serious adverse reactions of covid vaccines is the subject of denial and
silence on the part of the government and the main health agencies (National
Agency for the Safety of Medicines, High Health Authority, High Council of
Public Health, etc.). Everything happens as if it were a real taboo, in France as in
most other Western countries. The importance of these effects brings a
contradiction that is too blatant and devastating for the ideology of full
vaccination that guides governments that have chosen to abandon themselves in
the arms of the pharmaceutical industry. The latter is thus at the heart of all
the management of an epidemic that constitutes for it an unprecedented boon in
history: which patented commercial product has as a potential market the whole
of humanity, renewable every year what is more? Bosses and shareholders of
these pharmaceutical and biotechnological companies are becoming immensely wealthy. In view of the way in which these industries have worked (as a matter
of urgency, to generate maximum profits, without testing the people most at
risk - age and comorbidities - with the help of advertising formulas),
particularly in the United States and England, to develop these new genetic
vaccines (DNA or RNA), it was thus feared from the outset that these products
would not be of very good quality. But reality goes beyond these fears and
shows that these vaccines have more or less serious adverse effects than any
other before them. We have seen that in the Netherlands a rate of 2.7 deaths
per 100 000 vaccinated (16.5 million vaccinated, 448 deaths) is achieved. In France and the United States, this rate rises to
about 3.7 deaths per 100,000 vaccinated. And in Britain, this rate even climbs
to 4.3 deaths per 100,000 vaccinated, most likely due to the preponderance of
the AstraZeneca vaccine that has been known since March 2021 to be the most
dangerous of the four vaccines commonly used in the West (especially because of
the many thromboses that it causes and that are beginning to be documented in
the medical scientific literature, see for example, here and there),which is
hardly surprising when we know the conditions in which it was manufactured inChina. In passing, we also reported that this was the first vaccine
administered in France,
from February 2021, to health professionals. Hence one of the probable rational
reasons for the great reluctance to vaccinate against covid that some of them
will if manifesting.
This
vaccine mortality (which is only the tip of the iceberg of serious adverse
reactions) is therefore unprecedented, it is particularly serious and its
concealment is even more so. Let us be clear: concealing such a danger in one
way or another is quite simply criminal to the population. Even reduced to its
most basic principles of ethics(primum non nocere),the approach to this issue
in terms of public health should lead to the urgent suspension of the
vaccination campaign, to study in much more detail the data of this
pharmacovigilance (in particular according to age groups and according to the
different risk factors) and, after a meticulous benefit/risk analysis, to
determine to which very specific categories of the population it is possible to
offer vaccination without risk that the serious adverse effects are more
numerous than the serious forms of Covid from which it is supposed to protect
them. Any other approach is not a matter of public health but of ideological
posturing or commercial marketing. And history has already shown (on tobacco,
pesticides, oil pollution, etc.) that these postures and this marketing were
responsible for real crimes against civilian populations. That they are
committed in the name of the Good should in no way blind them to their reality
and nature. All those who indulge in it could now be considered as accomplices
in this new vaccine mortality that seems unprecedented in the history of modern
medicine.
